I was just back from Padang today, the food there was tasty and spicy, then I went with several friends of mine to Pdang Panjang, Bukittinggi, and Payakumbuh, nice…nice and nice.
So, I went to Padang for competition,i.e NUEDC(National Universities English Debate Competition) regional A1 in Padang, there were fun and disappointment. Well, in debate competition, we always expect the best adjudication.
Most of the adjudicators are inexperienced, sadly to say. The only adjudicator that is most experienced is Rachmat Nurcahyo, the chief adjudicator of NUEDC A1, a lecturer of UNY (Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta). He indeed went to several national as well as international debating events. Then we also had some people, though not that experienced, but ever joined BP/ other debate competitions, for example Muhardi from UNIMED, Mr.Yulianus Harefa, our lecturer, Fauzan from UNP but there were only few of them, and at least we considered them more experienced than the others.
However, most of the adjudicators, they were only good English speakers, but absolutely not good debaters, let alone adjudicators. We can convincedly say that we are much more experienced than them concerning debate.
USU sent two teams, USU A consist of me and Monalisa. USU B consist of Fajar and Khomas. The motions came quite late, and we had to do research hastily.
Anyway… USU A went smoothly and got absolute winning in preliminary rounds until the semi final round (or I should say, we ARE SUPPOSED TO GET ABSOLUTE WINNING UNTIL FINAL ROUND which I’ll explain later). What we mean by ‘absolute winning’ is getting the first rank out of four teams, which rarely happened in real debate competition. However, we can say that the debaters there, from other lands, were not used to debating, and only had English language skills as their basis.
It was unfortunate for us, because the adjudicators didn’t know about the rules, and therefore when we did some POIs (Point of Interruptions) , we were considered bad-mannered, and we were criticized until Final Round JUST BECAUSE we applied our knowledge in debating. In Final Round, it was such a disappointment, with seven adjudicators, four were lousy adjudictors, and three were experienced. After the Final Round, we were sure that we could win the debate with the 1st rank, as the previous winning of six debates. Yet, three experienced adjudicators, including the Chief Adju, gave the winning to us, as the other four who were actually not aware of debating gave the 1st rank to UNP A (Universitas Negeri Padang). The chief adjudicator said to one of us, that he couldn’t do much to help us, as the other four lecturers, mostly form Padang were very stubborn, but he told us that it was supposed to be USU A who got the winning. It was quite upbuilding for us, because we now know that we SHOULD HAVE BEEN the real winner. He told us that the only debaters he could see there is from USU. HEAR2!
As for USU B, which consist of Khomas and Fajar, they were great, and we suspected there were some kind of discriminations happening to them. Anyway, they got into semi final, and did their best till the end.
Yes, we all have done our best, and we are proud to say that USU, until the end of tournament, didn’t do any cheating, all casebuildings were done by ourselves( not like the other teams, for God’s sake, they used laptop when casebuilding, asking their lecturers, and casebuilding with their friends), and we still maintained good records of winning in the first debate until semi final round.
Please hope the best for us in PIMNAS, Semarang, in July, at least we wanna show their lousy lecturers that it’s indeed their wrong understanding, and we are supposed to get the 1st rank from the very first place! We don’t hate the debaters but we wanna show how lusy the adjudication was in the Final round!
Anyway, I love the committee, LOs, THE DEBATERS, they were very warm, and we did some games, drama, together.
P.S: I have got a fans club in Padang, hahahahaha! They absolutely love Catherine… .! Hear, hear!